<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Foobar2000 Blog &#187; Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fooblog2000.com/category/poll/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fooblog2000.com</link>
	<description>Foo for thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:58:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How can foobar continue to improve?</title>
		<link>http://www.fooblog2000.com/2007-02/how-can-foobar-continue-to-improve</link>
		<comments>http://www.fooblog2000.com/2007-02/how-can-foobar-continue-to-improve#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 17:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FofR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fooblog2000.com/2007-02/how-can-foobar-continue-to-improve</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am of course referring to 3rd party component development. With Terrestrial&#8217;s recent developments the foobar aesthetic capabilities have increased dramatically and we are all seeing some great design ideas. But I want to ask you now, what do you think is the next step in 3rd party development? What should be the next step? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fooblog2000.com/2007-02/how-can-foobar-continue-to-improve/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.037 seconds -->
